Calling the way Ohio funds public schools unpredictable, confusing and inadequate, Ohio lawmakers want to overhaul the system with a formula that could mean a $1.99 billion increase in funding. Changes could come sooner rather than later.

State Sens. Peggy Lehner, R-Kettering, and Vernon Sykes, D-Akron, introduced a bill late last week that teams with a current house bill. It would change how the state determines the cost of educating a student, along with how the state decides how much a local district should contribute to that cost.

The overhaul will be part of the upcoming lame duck session, according to Lehner.

“The lame duck is the appropriate place and provides the amount of time we need to pass this legislation,” Sen. Lehner said during a news conference Friday.

Also, an analyst and consultant who worked with lawmakers to help develop the new system said it could ease the need for districts to ask voters for new local tax levies.

“Is it going to eliminate the need for new levies completely? No,” consultant Michael Sobul said. “Is it going to greatly ease the need for it? We believe it will. We believe districts will have the additional resources from the state to meet the needs of the student,” the retired school treasurer said.

If passed and fully phased in over six years, it will mean nearly $2 billion more annually for Ohio schools. But each specific General Assembly will have the flexibility to base funding decisions on statewide economic situations, according to State. Rep. Gary Scherer, R-Circleville.

The plan looks at two basic steps. First, what is the base cost to educate a student? Second, how much can local communities pay?

The proposed base cost plan would incorporate professional development for teachers, health, safety, social and emotional needs of students, academic and athletic activities, technology, building and district operations, leadership and staff.

A key change to local funding, according to the sponsors, is the new plan will base 60 percent of a district’s local funding capacity on property values and 40 percent on resident income. Currently, only property values determine how much a local district can pay.

State Rep. John Patterson, D-Jefferson, pointed to Ohio farmers who face an economic crisis as an example. He said recently that farmers struggled selling crops, and, while property values remained high, wealth was virtually non-existent.

Under the current model, those farmers would have to pay more in property taxes to fund a local school district despite struggling financially.

Under the new plan, when fully in place and fully funded, all but nearly a dozen Ohio school districts would receive more state funding. That funding also allows for local district to make local decisions on how to use the money.

For example, according to Mr. Sobul, if the formula calls for funding for three third-grade teachers, local districts have the ability to decide if that is what’s needed or use the money for something else.

Also, the plan changes how community schools and voucher systems are paid. The money will go to the school educating the student, rather than the home district and then passed on.

“It will ease some of the tensions between community schools and vouchers and the local school systems,” Mr. Sobul said.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.